Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Ghosts and Liminal Spaces in Autumn

On Sunday, after our trip to the waterfalls and the old Tannery on Trout Creek, we stopped as usual at iPho in New Paltz. Noticing an autumnal display next door, my six-year-old asked me why the corn was brown and dry.


As I struggled to explain the cultural ideas around autumn to her, it hit me: autumn is a liminal state. It's transitional in a way that other seasons aren't. Now that I see that, it makes all the sense in the world that October in general, and Halloween in specific, feels so emotionally profound. The liminal state of autumn is, for me, closely tied to liminal spaces.


October has long been a time for me to wander out into farming fields such as those I walked as a child and chase that feeling of magic and mystery that the young me felt around Halloween. That chase is one of the great enigmas of my life. What was that feeling? Where did it come from? I never believed there were literal ghosts and what not. Looking back, it seems like the core of my devout agnosticism was always there. Church did nothing for me, and I would have found any adult who worried about my being inculcated with demonic influence just as risible. I always understood stories for what they were. But why were the stories and rituals around Halloween puissant? Why did they impress themselves into the wet clay of my mind so that now, still, decades later, I walk out into the dark and the wind and the crickets as though I'm hoping to chance upon some embodiment, likewise wandering, of a feeling I can't begin to articulate?


All of these thoughts coalesced around the feelings that arose as I walked around that liminal space along Trout Creek. Again, I don't believe in literal ghosts, yet something in me yearns to express itself in analogous terms. Nothing but tree litter and water in all its forms has disturbed those stones for a century or more, and because of that, those stones spoke to me in a way that no curated space could. 


Once again, I feel that I'm failing to articulate this feeling. The best I can do is to say that, when I'm scrutinizing those stones, I sense an impulse: a coalescence of intent reaching out from the past. In my mind's eye I see ripples or deformations suspended in the air—like the ripples from a stone thrown into a pond! Ha! I just landed on the most tired simile. But it's apt. All the people who toiled with every iota of craft that successive generations had bundled into their brains and their muscle memory made their impressions on this space. They had no notions of me specifically. Still, they reach out to me specifically, by virtue of serendipity. Their messages of toiling against entropy reach me.


Ghosts murmer to me from the air around forgotten stones.

Wednesday, October 9, 2019

Revisiting My Nerddom

There's this fat kid embedded in 1978, and he's still influencing my life. It's not his fault. He has no idea how his response ripples across the surface of the intervening decades and laps against me. Anyway, he's just doing what he needs to do to survive.

You may be thinking that I shouldn't call him a "fat kid" because putting the "fat" part first defines him by that physical attribute first, and by his humanity second. That's a fair point. And. Unless you're a saint, "fat" is the first thing you think of when you walk into that third-grade classroom. You see a startlingly round blob with a child in there somewhere, and you don't immediately know which gender that child is. He's the fattest kid in school by a country mile.



The desks are clustered into squares of four for a group activity. The teacher tells the students to discuss a story that the class has been reading. Of course some of the kids deviate from those instructions, as kids will. In the fat kid's group, some of the students start chatting about whatever it is that eight-year-olds would rather chat about.

Watch the fat kid closely. He's really getting into it. He obviously loves the opportunity to socialize with his peers. He's enthusiastically engaged in the conversation for maybe a minute. Then there's a moment when he gets quiet. You can see his face fall. You can see him retreat inside himself.

You may not understand why he shut down. Then again, it may be more obvious than I think. After all, the teacher sure seemed to get it. On his next report card, in the little space for teacher comments, she writes something to the effect of "Hugh seems (very? too?) interested in what the other children are (doing? saying?)." The fat kid knows—or at least he thinks he knows—exactly what she's referring to. He knows that his teacher thought that was important enough to put on his report card. As if he needed any more reminders of his shame.

He had been unforgivably stupid. He had let his guard down. He had let himself believe for a moment that he could be friendly—enthusiastic, even—with his peers. He had been thrilled. And then he had felt that creeping wave of numbness that accompanies the realization that he was not wanted. They were rolling their eyes at him. They didn't want him there. They didn't like him, and their most fervent wish in that moment was that he were not there.

There was nothing worse than that feeling. He knew then that he would do anything to avoid it. From then on, he would be alone before he would run the risk of experiencing that icy shame again.

And now I feel a different flavor of stupid. I feel stupid for letting that eight-year-old kid reach through time and influence me so strongly for so long.

I'm framing it wrongly, I know. Again, it's not his fault. He's not "reaching through time". He's just doing what he needs to do to survive. So the question becomes, at what point in the progression from him to me could he/I have broken out of that self-imposed isolation? At what point did I bear the responsibility, as an adult, to take risks that that child couldn't have borne?

Was I responsible during my college years? If so, then boy did I fuck that one up. I went backwards instead of forwards. While visiting my home town, I played exactly two games of Dungeons & Dragons with high school friends, and got spooked at the escapist feel of it. Back at Cornell, I looked around myself and noticed that, whether it was Star Trek or comic books or any other nerddom, there was always someone I could point to and say "They're much weirder than I am." That seemed dangerous. Afraid of my own obsessive nature, I erred on the side of isolation.

Sometime during my twenties, I made a halfhearted attempt to get into "Magic: The Gathering". I went to a gaming night at a local comic shop and found the players to be nasty and cutthroat. I was easily discouraged.

And now, here I am: forty-nine years old, looking back at the stacks of comic books I've bought and adored over the twenty-seven years since I graduated college. And I'm sad to think how I've failed to integrate them into my social life. I have friends and family whom I adore, and I have those stacks scattered about, but there's been virtually no connection between the latter and the former.

During most of those years I pointed to that nerd culture at Cornell to justify my perpetual fear of where my own obsessive personality might lead me within an atmosphere of so few checks and balances. But during the last few years that justification has broken down. I've seen co-workers, who seemed otherwise reasonably functional, going to Comic Con. And I've had this guy named Jeff May in my ears.

Jeff is a Los Angeles comedian and podcaster. He's remarkably similar to me in some ways, such as his love of comic books and his relationship with food. I have an eating disorder, so hearing another man talk openly about sugar addiction and body dysmorphia is like ambrosia to me. Yet in other ways he's unfathomable. Where I internalized the geek/jock divide to such an extent that it took me decades to accept that I could be athletic, he embraced his athleticism from a young age. Where I failed to integrate my love of comic books into my broader life, he's woven his love of comic books into his relationships and his career. And then there's the comedy. I can't begin to imagine having the confidence to get up on that stage. I'm fascinated that a person can be at once so like and so unlike me.

A few weeks ago I found out that Jeff would be at New York Comic Con. Since he seldom gets to the east coast, and I hardly ever get to the west, I set aside time to meet him. As it turned out, I got more time with him than I expected.

On Thursday he kindly let me use his bonus Comic Con pass so I could see the Sideshow Collectibles panel he was hosting. He met me outside, gave me the pass, and led me to Artist's Alley, where I spent an hour boggling at the enormity of the event and fretting about how to behave. "I've got no common ground with artists. What can I say to them that won't sound like the same lame questions they've been asked a thousand times? And hey, these cosplayers are amazing, but what's the etiquette about taking pictures? Should I just ask them?"

Then I attended the panel, which was a discussion between six artists, with Jeff as the moderator. Being there to see it happen live was a delight, as was my conversation afterward with artist Phil Jimenez. Then I gave Jeff his badge back and said goodbye, hoping to see him at his standup gig in Queens on Saturday.

Jeff's a busy guy. He didn't need to take time out for me. Yet, grateful as I was, he seemed at least as grateful to me for my support as a fan. And at some point on Saturday, as I was planning that night's trip to Queens, I realized why his graciousness meant so much to me.

Prior to meeting Jeff, I thought how disappointing it would be if he turned out to be an asshole in person. This didn't seem unreasonable, given all the stories I've heard about fans who met celebrities to their regret. But then, as I prepared to go meet him for a second time, I realized that my underlying fear was much older. I was afraid of reliving that moment in third grade: that creeping realization that "...Oh. He doesn't really like me. He doesn't want me here. He's just being polite."

Silly as it may sound, my taking the train into Manhattan wasn't just the act of a Jeff May fan meeting Jeff May. It was a leap of faith, and a real risk. I was setting myself up for what I swore I'd never let myself feel again.

And then we met, and we chatted, and I saw his standup, which was as delightful as I'd expected. And then we hung out and played pinball, and it was a blast. But more than that... it was fine. I was fine. What had I been so worried about? Being an overbearing fanboy? Overstepping my boundaries? Being too socially awkward? It seems that none of that happened. It seems that I just went and had a great time like any normal person might. It seems that... maybe I had no reason to worry?



On Sunday I used Jeff's bonus pass again to spend a few more hours at Comic Con. I got past my awkwardness and had a few gratifying conversations with artists. Then I just roamed the halls and soaked in the glorious cosplay, which led me to the most impactful moment of the weekend.

I wandered outside to an area where some serious cosplayers had room to work. I made my way through the crowd, and then, as a few observers parted ahead of me, I saw a vision that stopped me in my tracks. It was Thundra. Thundra! My God, Thundra, who tussled with Ben Grimm at Project Pegasus during those halcyon days of Marvel Two-In-One! My face did all sorts of contortions, and my hand went to my mouth as I struggled to compose myself. Finally I was able to speak, and I said to her "You just stepped out of my childhood."



And just like that... I become a cosplay fan, and started planning my own costume.

Mama always said, life was like a danger room.

After nearly three decades of fearing my own nerddom, I spent five hours at Comic Con, and now I want to embrace it again. And in large part I have Jeff to thank for that. He's a goddamn relentlessly humane man: a world-class ambassador to nerddom. I'm grateful to him.

Monday, August 12, 2019

Massive Communal Web of Mecynogea lemniscata


For fifteen years I’ve been scrutinizing the foliage in my search for spiders to photograph. Up until two weeks ago I’d never seen anything remotely like this massive communal web with dozens of Mecynogea lemniscata. Since then I’ve returned to it daily, and have been thrilled to observe the mating pairs and the proliferation of egg sacs. I’ve gotten good shots of the beautiful, distinctive dome webs and their occupants, but I’ve been frustrated in my attempts to convey the extent of the entire colony. Getting a single shot of it is impossible, so I’ve been working on different approaches to shooting a video. Given the constraints of my iPhone and the five-month-old child strapped to my torso, I’ve not been able to get one that was worth sharing until today. I needed to get the phone ten or fifteen feet up to the top of the branches where most of the egg sacs are, so I improvised the sophisticated equipment you see here: a broom handle, a metal rod and some duct tape. I hope to get a better video after more practice, but for now, here’s a halfway decent view of this amazing colony I’ve been observing. It may be difficult to make out, but trust me: I counted at least twenty broods, many with two or three sacs.


Sunday, July 28, 2019

The subtle artistry of Mecynogea lemniscata

As far as I knew, I hadn't seen a Mecynogea lemniscata in years. Then, four days ago, I saw one. I returned the next day to examine the web again. It's so delicate that it's difficult to make out details unless the lighting conditions are just so. After that second examination, I knew there was something odd about the construction of that dome. It looked like a regular grid of tiny squares, rather than the series of irregularly sized trapezoids that characterize an orb web*.
Later that day I found another specimen with an amazing web in excellent lighting, and the shots I got just made me more curious. How the heck is that dome constructed? It can't be a regular grid, because the rows seem to follow a radial arrangement. Moving out from the center, the number of squares in each ring has to increase.
Well, today I found dozens more of the same species, and I finally got some shots with enough detail to answer the question of its construction. I cropped two images and circled the spots where one radial row becomes two, two become three, etc. I don't know anything about knitting, but my wife tells me the spider does the same thing a knitter does.





The pictures above show only a section of the dome, and the dome is only one component of an intricate and varied structure. For the last few days I've been wondering if I could shoot a video that would convey that astonishing complexity. Those new specimens gave me the opportunity to do just that.

I managed to approximate the act of examining a Mecynogea lemniscata web in this video. No one photograph or illustration can convey its intricacy. There must be thousands of strands, and the different sections of the web have wildly different types of construction. To take it in, you have to let your eyes range over it, here stepping back to take in the whole thing, there focusing on a few square millimeters. I played with the focus here to simulate that.



*An orb web is just the traditional Halloween web, with radial spokes and concentric rings.

Saturday, July 27, 2019

Mecynogea lemniscata with dome web

Three days ago I was delighted at my first Mecynogea lemniscata sighting in years. The next day I returned, and as I scrutinized the web, I began to comprehend its elaborate structure. The strands of the dome seemed to form a regular grid, rather than the variably-sized trapezoids of an orb web.

Just a few hours later, on the other side of town, I found another specimen of the same species. This one had a much larger web, and had built it in a spot that was ideal for viewing, so you can imagine how thrilled I was.

This was my first good, close look at a Mecynogea lemniscata web. Now that I've had the opportunity to scrutinize its structure, I understand what I didn't before: that it's too intricate for any single photograph or illustration to capture. I looked through all the images for the species on BugGuide, and I found only three shots showing a significant portion of a web: one showing a dome shimmering in the sunlight; one showing the strand of egg sacs hanging over a dome; and one showing a magnificent triple-decker stack of domes. Not one of them even begins to convey the intricacy of the web I saw.

The illustration below comes from Harriet Exline's 1948 research study "Morphology, habits, and systematic position of Allepeira lemniscata (Walckenaer)". It's an excellent diagram, but now that I've gotten a good look at a web up close, I see that it's only a diagram. The density and delicacy of the strands is of another order of magnitude than what the diagram shows, because you couldn't pack all those lines into one diagram.



The web of Mecynogea lemniscata is a wonder of micro-engineering, and in order to grasp the intricacy of its structure, you need to let your eye range over it. I would need expensive video equipment to even approach the experience I had with my nose in that web. In lieu of that, here is a selection of crops from the images I took at the time. Hopefully they will give you a sense of the experience, and encourage you to seek out one of these marvels for yourself.

I added the red dots to make the dome profile more visible.

Note the detail of the dome web to the right of center.

Note the deformation in the grid from the anchor line.

Note the profusion of delicate strands pulling up on the orb web to shape it into a dome.

More detail on the strands pulling up on the orb web to shape it into a dome.

More detail on the strands pulling up on the orb web to shape it into a dome.

Note how the lower anchor lines deform the orb into a smooth curve.

Note how the lower anchor lines deform the orb into a smooth curve.

Note how the lower anchor lines deform the orb into a smooth curve.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Closeup of the grid and an anchor line deforming its shape.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Closeup of the dome and its architect.

Uloborus glomosus parasitism?

Today I visited the shrub where I first observed U. glomosus a few weeks ago, and noticed that one of the strings of egg sacs had a pale sac with a hole in it. Now that I've examined the picture, I think my impression at the time was correct: it's empty. I didn't see any spiderlings, and besides, odds are that a sac on the end of the string would hatch first. So I suspected a predator—probably a wasp—had made that hole.


A few blocks down the street I chanced upon the scene below. As I approached, the U. glomosus specimen shown in the pictures crawled up the egg sac strand. I didn't know whether that movement was in response to my approach, or to the little wasp, but as you can see, she resumed her resting position, and the wasp kept going about its business. So it appears that the spider wasn't aware of the wasp.

A quick look at a few research papers and at BugGuide tells me that chalcid wasps are known parasites of Uloborus, so it seems likely that we're looking at one, although my cell phone shots make it impossible to determine the species.





Friday, July 26, 2019

Uloborus glomosus carrying a bundle while wrapping prey

Yesterday I was lucky enough to encounter this specimen of U. glomosus as it pounced on an insect that had just gotten stuck in its web. I started snapping pictures, and recorded a video. This is a cropped version of that video. It clearly shows the reason I was so intrigued: the black object that the specimen was somehow carrying as it wrapped its prey. 


These pictures show the object, and the wrapping process, more clearly. After studying them, I came to the conclusion that the black bundle was not somehow slung behind the caphalothorax, as I originally thought. I think she's holding it in her chelicerae and pedipalps.














I took these shots about five minutes later. Note that the new prey, on the far right, is fully wrapped, and the specimen is back in her warren, still holding the black bundle. 


Here's a closeup of a bundle from a previous catch...


...and here's a closeup of the specimen with her bundle. What do you think it is? My best guess is that it's the bundled remains of an ant that she's still digesting.